Expert reveals ‘one glaring omission’ in Meghan’s explosive statement

Meghan Markle
Meghan Markle

An authority on royal matters has identified “one glaring omission” in Meghan Markle’s furious response to rumors that she sent a letter to King Charles.

The Royal Family is in danger of being shaken by the uproar surrounding Meghan Markle’s most recent public remark about the monarch, which comes just days before the King’s historic Coronation.

The Duchess of Sussex recently commented on a Telegraph article that claimed King Charles wrote to his daughter-in-law after she spoke with Oprah Winfrey.

During the conversation, Meghan revealed to the US host that a royal family member had voiced reservations about the skin tone of her baby kid.

The former Suits actress was written to by the then-Prince of Wales to address her “racism concerns,” but Ms. Markle reportedly did not find his response adequate, according to the Express.

“The Duchess feels she has not received a satisfactory response to her concerns,” the publication’s royal editor Victoria Ward said.

The Duchess is said to feel that her concerns, which significantly include the way bullying accusations against her were handled and the claim that institutional neglect caused her to feel suicidal, have not yet been addressed.

Additionally, it was said that the letters revealed that the elder royal had reservations about the unborn Archie. The Duchess of Sussex issued the following statement in response to the allegations made in the article: “The Duchess of Sussex is going about her life in the present, not thinking about correspondence from two years ago related to conversations from four years ago.” Meghan and Harry’s biographer Omid Scobie also addressed the allegations in the article.

Any claim to the contrary is untrue and plainly absurd. Daniela Elser, a royal specialist, noted a significant absence from the statement, which she claimed rejected the assertions that the King’s letter in response to her charges of racism was inadequate and that the so-called “royal racist” was identified.

For news.com.au, Ms. Elser wrote: “Now, maybe the 41-year-old and her press staff believed that these two phrases represented a clear rejection of her participation in any manner with the Telegraph story as they sat around an ethically sourced conference table.

The former Suits actress rarely has time for rearview mirror navel-gazing with two young children, a blog that may soon be relaunching, and the odd rumor of political aspirations.

“However, it seems like an odd slip or omission not explicitly to deny the Telegraph account supplied. (In actuality, making this assertion merely served to prove how quickly these letters traveled back and forth between California and London in 2021.)”

Designerzcentral