heir daughter’s birth and ‘Lilibet Diana’ on the day she arrived – all before getting approval from the Queen about using her pet name,” according to the Daily Mail.
The Markle’s Admit to Their Behavior
According to the outlet, the domain LiliDiana.com was registered on May 31, four days before Lili was born in Santa Barbara, California and they secured LilibetDiana.com on June 4 the day the baby was born.
They sure were busy—hours later Harry threatened legal action for reporting on the baby’s name. Most new parents are eager to show off their child, but the Markle’s seem to welcome the miracle birth as just another opportunity for legal proceedings. Amazing.
They waited a couple of more days before announcing Lilibet Diana’s arrival and, “Harry insists he spoke to his grandmother about the name ‘in advance of the announcement’ but has not been specific on when that exactly was only to say.”
In his own roundabout way, Harry defended himself by saying, “His grandmother was the first family member he called.”
The Markle’s Are Honoring Their Family How?
A spin doctor for the couple told The Telegraph, “As is often customary with public figures, a significant number of domains of any potential names that were considered were purchased… to protect against the exploitation of the name once it was later chosen and shared.
The Daily Mail states, “The statement suggests that had Her Majesty refused to allow them to use Lilibet they would have gone for another name amongst the ‘significant’ number of domains they bought before the birth.”
Harry was in the UK in April for the funeral of his grandfather Prince Philip. After he trashed the family to Oprah Winfrey among others, “The Times reported that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge did not hold any meetings with Prince Harry after Prince Philip’s funeral because they feared any details would be leaked. They spoke briefly while walking from St George’s Chapel.”
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Try To Boost Public Image Amid Prince Charles Baby Bombshell!?https://t.co/I6PpPikkKQ
— SOS/CTS/HH (@SoapOperaSpy) June 22, 2021
Furthermore, royal historian Robert Lacey said, “They told friends that they could see no point in talking to Harry since any discussion of substance would go straight back to Meghan to be leaked via Oprah [Winfrey] or some other tentacle of the Sussex network.”
Lacey has also revealed that he believes the reason Meghan walked out of a UN event in Fiji, “was because she resented being an ‘advocate’ and not a ‘goodwill ambassador.”
Was this just another example of the Markle’s manipulating the name game?